Overall rating 
4.4 / 5
4.4 / 5
runs small
3.2 / 5
runs large
runs narrow
3 / 5
runs wide
234 out of 265(88%)reviewers recommend this product.
Product Reviews
Overall rating 
4 / 5
4 / 5
runs small
too big
runs large
runs narrow
true to width
runs wide
TCgreenmama
Age:25-29
too big
PostedApril 2, 2012
I wear a 7 in all other TOMS but these are too big so they have to go back. Other than that they are awesome.
Overall rating 
3 / 5
3 / 5
runs small
true to size
runs large
carlina
fromBrooklyn
Age:25-29
Ouch
PostedApril 1, 2012
Prosunforgiving
ConsMedium width
Ive always heard that Toms are super comfortable and as these are my first pair I'm going to respectfully disagree. They are very nice looking and I get a slew of compliments, however I also have a blister on my left inner-arch that is pretty intense. The burlap material is very unforgiving as it chafes my skin in that area. I'm hoping it will soften up over time, until then I will be wearing a bandage in that area. I've also gotten 2 pairs of ballet flats from Toms and am very happy about them both-but I had to size down an entire size with both pairs.
Overall rating 
5 / 5
5 / 5
runs small
true to size
runs large
Susieq62
fromCalifornia
Age:45-49
Burlap Toms
PostedMarch 28, 2012
Proscomfortable
ConsMedium width
I bought these as a gift for my Grandaughter she loves them they are comfortable and they look cute for the spring . They are nice for all ages I got a pair for me and my daughter she wanted the glitter ones and she liked her too!
Overall rating 
5 / 5
5 / 5
runs small
true to size
runs large
Bobonne
fromLongmont, CO
Age:55-59
PostedMarch 17, 2012
Proscute
ConsMedium width
My daughter-in-law purchased the Burlap Slip-On, so I decided to order myself. They looked much cuter on her. My skin tone is olive, so maybe the color just did not work for me...
Like the grey Classic better for me.
  • 2024-03-28 T16:16:03.103-05:00
  • bvseo_pps, prod_bvrr, vn_prr_5.6
  • cp-43, bvpage2n
  • co_hasreviews, tv_266, tr_266
  • loc_en_US, sid_3132522, prod, sort_default
169-172 of 266