Overall rating 
4 / 5
4 / 5
runs small
2.8 / 5
runs large
249 out of 302(82%)reviewers recommend this product.
Product Reviews
Overall rating 
4 / 5
4 / 5
runs small
true to size
runs large
EvaFleur
fromWashington, DC
Age:40-44
Cute top-dresses up jeans
PostedMay 20, 2016
Prosflattering on
Very flattering top. Beautiful colors. Decent material-still have not washed so not sure how they will hold up.
Overall rating 
4 / 5
4 / 5
runs small
a little small
runs large
CMermaid
Age:50-54
Love these tees!
PostedMay 5, 2016
I have this t-shirt in multiple colors. It is such a great fit, and the ruching is my best friend! For those trying to figure out sizing, I'm 5'7", 143 lbs, and I like the Large on me. I'm usually a size 8 or a Medium in most clothes. The Medium in this works as well but it's a little snug along my back, showing a few bumps from my bra.
The reason I didn't give it 5 stars, is that in the past (last year) I've found the quality to be mixed - 2 of the shirts came with small holes in them - Nordstrom was happy to swap, but I'd rather not have to go through that. Also, on one, the color didn't hold through the washing - ended with a few streaks. Then I have another 3 in different colors that have been fine. Since I love the t-shirt, I just bought a couple more colors and the quality seems good this time around.
7 of 7 found this review helpful.
Overall rating 
5 / 5
5 / 5
runs small
true to size
runs large
Katydids
fromSan Francisco
Age:60-64
Cute tee shirt
PostedMay 1, 2016
Great basic t-shirt, nicely styled and very comfortable.
Overall rating 
1 / 5
1 / 5
runs small
too small
runs large
EWT23
Age:45-49
Transparent
PostedApril 26, 2016
The cut of this tee is nice, although it runs quite small. in white, this is extremely sheer, and summer is no time for layering. Poor quality, returned without hesitation.
5 of 5 found this review helpful.
  • 2024-03-28 T23:58:22.654-05:00
  • bvseo_pps, prod_bvrr, vn_prr_5.6
  • cp-43, bvpage2n
  • co_hasreviews, tv_456, tr_456
  • loc_en_US, sid_3132547, prod, sort_default
169-172 of 456